BearingSolve logo

ISO 16281:2025 guide

Internal Bearing Load Distribution Relevant to ISO 16281

Learn how clearance, misalignment, ring displacement, and nonlinear rolling-element stiffness affect the load distribution used in ISO 16281 calculations.

Why internal load distribution matters

External force is not divided equally among a bearing's rolling elements. Internal clearance, preload, contact angle, ring displacement, elastic deformation, and misalignment determine which elements are loaded and by how much. The most heavily loaded contact often governs stress and rating life.

ISO 16281:2025 covers modified reference rating life for universally loaded rolling bearings and includes effects beyond the basic ISO 281 calculation. It replaced the previous ISO/TS 16281:2008 technical specification. The standard includes operating clearance, tilt or misalignment, and internal rolling-element load distribution in the life calculation.

Scope of this introduction

This page explains the internal equilibrium step relevant to ISO 16281. It does not reproduce the standard or provide its complete basic and modified reference rating-life procedure.

The calculation model

For each rolling element j, the relative ring displacement and local geometry produce a normal approach δj. An element carries load only when that approach closes the available clearance and establishes contact.

Qj=Kδjm,forδj>0nonlinear rolling-element load–deflection relationship

In simplified Hertzian relationships, the exponent is commonly 3/2 for ball or point contact and 10/9 for roller or line contact. A complete model uses bearing geometry, slice or contact models where applicable, and the method specified for the bearing type.

Force and moment equilibrium

The unknown ring translations and tilts are adjusted until the vector sum of all rolling-element contact forces and moments balances the applied radial force, axial force, and overturning moments. Because contact load depends nonlinearly on displacement—and contacts can open or close—the solution is normally iterative.

  1. PositionLocate each rolling element around the bearing pitch circle.
  2. DeflectCalculate local approach from translations, tilt, clearance, and geometry.
  3. LoadConvert positive contact approaches into rolling-element loads.
  4. BalanceIterate until internal forces and moments equal the applied load system.

Worked calculation setup

Consider a radial roller bearing with 12 rollers under a 20 kN radial load. Dividing 20 kN by 12 would incorrectly predict 1.67 kN per roller. Instead, the solver starts with ring displacement in the load direction. Rollers opposite the load direction may retain clearance and carry no load, while rollers inside the load zone carry different loads according to their angular position and local deflection.

The displacement is iterated until the resolved roller forces sum to 20 kN. If a moment or misalignment is added, the load can also vary along each roller and the two raceway contacts. BearingSolve performs this numerical equilibrium step and exposes the resulting rolling-element load and stress distributions.

Common mistake

Do not use the average rolling-element load to estimate maximum contact stress. Clearance and misalignment can concentrate the load on a much smaller part of the bearing.

Standards and further reading

This educational guide does not reproduce the standards. Its equations and examples have been checked against the cited public references, but the guide has not been independently certified or reviewed for your application. Use the current standard, manufacturer data, and an appropriate engineering review for final bearing selection.

Apply the method

Run a complete bearing calculation

Model bearing geometry, loading, lubrication, life, load distribution, and contact stresses in one workflow.

Open BearingSolve